Key Takeaways
Electric vehicles are rapidly depreciating in value as the buyer’s market becomes saturated and the upfront costs and limitations scare buyers away.
In some cases, depreciation is twice that of internal combustion engine vehicles.
The Biden-Harris Administration has been issuing edicts forcing automakers to produce more electric vehicles or pay steep fines.
Europe is experiencing a similar trend, which has been exacerbated by a flood of cheap electric vehicles from China, and where few Europeans purchase cars, choosing to lease instead.
The forced march towards electric vehicles being promoted by the Biden-Harris Administration is creating unforeseen problems, all of which will have to be resolved by the American public.
Electric vehicles are experiencing significant depreciation rates. For instance, a Tesla Model 3 will lose 45 percent of its value after three years, whereas a gas-powered Toyota RAV4 will depreciate by just 22 percent over the same period. After only one year, the resale value of a Tesla Model 3 is roughly 64.38 percent of its original price. Recent figures from CarEdge suggest that Teslas can depreciate at twice the rate of gas-powered cars. The Tesla Model Y, Model S, and Model X are projected to depreciate by 57 percent after five years, in contrast to the 28 percent depreciation expected for the RAV4. Tesla is facing a potential saturation point where the abundance of Teslas on the road may reduce their appeal, similar to what occurred with the Toyota Camry in the 1990s.
In 2021, Hertz announced plans to purchase 100,000 electric vehicles from Tesla, but the company encountered disappointing rental demand and higher-than-anticipated costs. By January, Hertz decided to sell off 20,000 of these vehicles, with prices dropping to as low as $25,000. The depreciation of these vehicles resulted in a $588 million loss for Hertz in the first quarter of this year compared to the last quarter of 2023. This “EV nightmare” also led to the CEO’s dismissal.
A recent survey by McKinsey & Company revealed that globally, 30 percent of electric vehicle owners are likely to switch back to gas-powered vehicles for their next purchase. The main dissatisfaction among EV owners is inadequate public charging infrastructure, a problem expected to worsen. The Energy Policy Research Foundation (EPRINC) found that the U.S. will need to significantly expand its charging network to meet the anticipated demand for the electric vehicles required under the Biden-Harris Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) CAFE standards, finalized in June, and the Environmental Protection Agency’s tailpipe standards, finalized in March, are pushing automakers to produce electric vehicles that result in significant financial losses.
The CAFE standards are based on a production-weighted average of mileage ratings across a manufacturer’s fleet, meaning compliance is based on the range of models an automaker produces. EPRINC research indicates that current popular vehicle models will far exceed the 2032 emission limits set by the Biden-Harris standards. For instance, the Toyota Camry, Nissan Rogue, and Toyota RAV4—two SUVs and a sedan—emit more than twice the amount of pollutants allowed by the 2032 regulations.
To meet these standards, automakers must transition a significant portion of their production to electric vehicles. Hybrids, which combine electric and gas-powered components, may help meet the standards, and many manufacturers are preparing to rely on them. A fleet of entirely gas-powered vehicles would need to be fully hybrid to comply with the Biden-Harris standards.
Automakers that fail to meet these standards hundreds of millions of dollars in fines. Many automakers are struggling with the financial losses from their EV lines, relying on profits from gas-powered vehicles to stay profitable. For example, Ford lost $132,000 on each electric vehicle sold in the first quarter of this year but reported a net income of $1.3 billion due to revenues from its gas-powered and hybrid vehicles. This means that consumers buying non-EVs are essentially subsidizing the losses incurred by government mandates.
EV owners are also facing greater financial strain when trading in their vehicles. According to Edmunds, 23.9 percent of new vehicle sales with a trade-in had negative equity, the highest rate recorded since early 2021. The average amount of negative equity, or “upside-down” loans, rose to a record $6,255 in the second quarter of 2024, up from $4,487 in the second quarter of 2022. For EV owners, negative equity reached $10,326 in the second quarter of this year, nearly double the $5,469 recorded in the same period in 2022. Over the last few years, inflated vehicle trade-in values kept consumers somewhat shielded from falling underwater on their car loans. As trade-in values normalize and the market adjusts, EV owners are increasingly feeling the financial impact, with some vehicle types more affected than others.
European Auto Markets