The Institute for Energy Research is a not-for-profit organization that conducts intensive research and analysis on the functions, operations, and government regulation of global energy markets.

About IER
Studies and Data
June 30, 2015

What is the True Cost of Electricity?

June 30, 2015
Print Friendly
Facebook

Electricity from New Wind Three Times More Costly than Existing Coal

WASHINGTON – Today, the Institute for Energy Research released a first-of-its-kind study calculating the levelized cost of electricity from existing generation sources. Our study shows that on average, electricity from new wind resources is nearly four times more expensive than from existing nuclear and nearly three times more expensive than from existing coal. These are dramatic increases in the cost of generating electricity. This means that the premature closures of existing plants will unavoidably increase electricity rates for American families.

Almost all measures of the cost of electricity only assess building new plants–until now. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, we offer useful comparison between existing plants and new plants.

America’s electricity generation landscape is rapidly changing. Federal and state policies threaten to shutter more than 111 GW of existing coal and nuclear generation, while large amounts of renewables, such as wind, are forced on the grid. To understand the impacts of these policies, it is critical to understand the cost difference between existing and new sources of generation.

The following chart shows the sharp contrast in the cost of electricity from existing sources vs. new sources:

LCOE press png

 

Click here to view the full study.

This study was conducted by Tom Stacy, a former member of the ASME Energy Policy Committee, and George Taylor, PhD, the director of Palmetto Energy Research. The source of the calculations used in this study is a compilation of data reported by the generators themselves to FERC and EIA.

###

Print Friendly

View Comments
  • Thatguy

    I just find it funny that the guy who runs the IER spent 20 years working for Enron…

    • Tom Stacy

      What is funny about it, “thatguy”? Don’t assume Rob “was” Enron or had anything to do with their lack of principles. On the contrary, Rob had always been a free market economist and despised much of what went on – and still goes on – in the electricity sector. You can read all about this in his bio and books on the subject at http://www.masterresource.org Very cool and fascinating story.

  • maryo

    One of these days, we will be like England, putting a dime in a meter in our homes to “x” number of hours heat and electricity.

Back to top